JOHN MARK - SCIENTIST

2010-10-23T12:58:00.000-07:00

(Excerpts)

The Big Bang & The Expanding Universe

by John Mark

The Hubble Law, also called the Hubble equation describes the relation of the velocity and the distance from the observer of each of many galaxies observed over a wide range by Edwin Hubble, Vesto Slipher, Milton Humason and their associates and successors, and it is the velocity= H x distances or, if v=velocity and s=distances, namely v=Hs in which H is the Hubble Constant - a constant of proportionality.

For each galaxy, the velocity v is calculated from red shift, spectographic observations and from the Doppler effect. Thedistances from the observer s was determined from the absolute brightness, from the period called Cepheid variables, the Cepheid variable stars were the key instruments in Edwin Hubble’s 1923 conclusion that M31 (Andromeda) was an external galaxy as opposed to a smaller nebula within the Milky Way, from the apparent brightness measurements, and from the Inverse Square Law relating those measurements to distances.

As can be seen from this equation, H has the dimension of time with H^-(with minus superscript) and is based on many observations of many galaxies over a wide range of distances and corresponding velocities.

The value of H^- is determined as being between the limits of 15 kilometers per second per million light years, and 30 kilometers per second per million light years, or the equivalent limits of 50 kilometers per second per megaparsec and 10 kilometers per megaparsec.

These limits are approximately equivalent to V=1/H having the dimension of time lying between the limits of 10 x 10⁹years and 20 x 10⁹years, and 15 x 10⁹years that are often being used as acceptable value.

Why is this important?

Because answering this question correctly will help us understand whether there was something before, or whether there was nothing before. If the Universe is expanding faster than the speed of light under the influence of Dark Matter that comprises roughly 96% of all space, either way the answer is fascinating, but I don’t think the answer is in the Higgs boson, or in the Higgs field, or in even correctly quantifying and in understanding Dark Matter.

For over a 1,000 years humanity has been stuck on “earth-is-flat” concept until Copernican revolution has changed it, and for nearly 100 years now we have been stuck on Einstein’s quantum mechanics and quantum relativity, and both are being seriously questioned although many other tenets in Einstein's assertions, as in other theories are still valid and irrefutable.

There are and there will be many more laws for humanity to discover for millions of years that will make our current models, theories and beliefs look as obsolete and silly as Aristotle’s conviction that the heart was the center of cognition, or worse, hence in as much as we would like to connect various string theory variables with contemporary models of reality we also realize that asking those questions over and over again in different context in search for more intelligible answers is crucial to everyone.

The concept of all different galaxies being packed together at infinite density at the same instant, and the subseqeuent “Big Bang”, as well as the concept of “the Age of The Universe” being equal to 1/H, or a fraction of 1/H maybe impossible precisely as the consequence of the Hubble observations and the Hubble Law with respect to the calculation of t=s/v as the same conclusions can be presented in a slightly different way as follows:

Let the observed galaxy be labeled 1^G2^G3^G4^Gn^Getc. going in order from the distant to the less distant, and let the observed distance for the galaxy 1^Gbe labeled 1^sob, for galaxy 2^Glet it be 2^sob and the observed galaxy 3^Gbe labeled 3^sob with n^Grepresenting n^sob so that 1^sob> 2^sob> 3^sob> 4^sob> n^sob and let the corresponding observed velocities be labeled in the same way, e.g. 1^vobfor galaxy 1^G, 2^vob for galaxy 2^G, 3^vob for galaxy 3^G, 4^vob for galaxy 4^G, n^vob for galaxy n^G, so that 1^vob>2^vob> 3^vob> 4^vob> continue as n^sob, etc.

Thus, every galaxy observed with n meaning unobserved is older that one going back to the moment of s=0 from the point of observation where 1/H, or a fraction of 1/H in the so-called “Age of the Universe” in order of its distance s^obas observed over a wide range, could not equal 0 simultaneously for different galaxies, or their precursors, therefore, the Hubble Law even if altered in order to conform to “The Age of the Universe” hypothesis equals 1/H , and even if when the time interval is calculated with the equation of t=s/v is not and cannot be the basis for, and actually contradicts the concept of “The Age of the Universe” equal 1/H, or 2/3 x 1/H scenario.

Likewise, the Hubble Law is not and cannot be the basis for such dependent concepts as a theory, namely that all the galaxies, or their precursors were packed together simultaneously at infinite density in zero volume with s=0 and t=0 for each galaxy, and the ensuing concept of “The Big Bang”.

Moreover, the complicated physics and stages of the first second after “The Big Bang” along with different theories of inflation, specifically the concept of singularity, and the existence of quantum gravity occuring at the instant of “The Big Bang”, the concept of the microwave radiation background observed today as a relic of radiation from the early universe and widely acknowledged as the evidence of “The Big Bang”’, including all the concepts directly dependent on “The Big Bang” theory such as the age of the universe equal 1/H, or a fraction of 1/H combined with Friedman-Robertson-Walker models whether with standard, or distorted version of the Hubble Law together, simply do not and cannot compute.

Let us digress a little bit, namely if we accept some form of “non-local” deterministic reality whereby we assume that some things travel faster than the speed of light, we will be violating Einstein’s special theory of relativity; and Einstein has created this paradox himself by introducing quantum mechanics and special relativity theories together that contradict one another whereby on the quantum level signals do travel faster than the speed of light, and according to "The Big Bang" theory the Universe is expanding at speeds faster than the speed of light, and whereby special theory of relativity expressly prohibits this. So was Einstein wrong?

Not necessarily. In fact, we are simply trying to get beyond Einstein and the inherent paradox in the special relativity theory and quantum mechanics in search of new rules that govern the behavior of matter and energy, hence the subsequent refutation of the Big Bang theory is not a surprise, or exception, while realizing at the same time that at some point we may have to let go of it as well.

If the Hubble law were not abandoned, as it has been by assuming that v was a constant, and H a variable, and the original Hubble Law v=Hs were followed, with v a variable and H a constant, then calculating t, the time corresponding to the increase of the distance of 0 to s as calculated from equation t=s/v would require t, not only as t=tob and s=sob but all other values of s, except 0 at s=0, t=s/v = 0/0 an indeterminate number we would not have “The Big Bang Theory”.

Morever, the limit of s/v as s and v approach 0 is 1/H, thus by calculating from t= s/v, t would equal 1/H, not only for sob - the observed distance, and vob - the observed distances and velocities of galaxies as they existed in the distant past, but for all other values of s and v, including s=0 for every galaxy. It appears from these equations employing t=s/v as a method for calculating time intervals under the unaltered Hubble Law gives unreasonable and inconclusive results, implying that the method is faulty.

The method to present the reciprocal of the constant H of proportionality, i.e. 1/H having the dimension of time as an actual time span, and the hastily arrived at conclusion that the time interval from 0 to tob corresponding to the distance interval from s=0 to s= sob was given by the equation of t= tob =sob divided by vob=1 divided by Ho for each galaxy led to the concept that the age of the Universe equal 1/Ho given the absence of gravity, the concept of the “Big Bang Theory” and to the subsequent theories ensuing therefrom.

To maintain these concepts and at the same time to maintain the appearance of conforming to the Hubble Law as required, as described above the subtle alteration, without being obvious, and without negligently appearing was presented of the Hubble Law except at Vo=Ho sob.

Another assumption, or perhaps it was an oversight without any awareness that it was being assumed was that the observed distance sob and the observed velocity vob for each galaxy were existing at the moment when each observation was being made. This assumption is repeated whenever the statement is made that 1/H (“Hubble Time”) or a fraction of 1/H is the “Age of the Universe” from the beginning to the present, and also by the designation of the value of H as determined by the observation of Hubble et al, with Ho defined as “present” value of H.

In actuality, all the observations made by Hubble, Humason and their successors were of the sob’s -the observed distance, and vob’s - the observed distances and velocities of galaxies as they existed in the distant past, and the time interval to the present being in direct proportion to the sob - the observed distance for each galaxy.

Thus the concept of all the different galaxies being packed together at infinite density at the same instant and the subsequent “Big Bang”, as well as the concept of the Age of the Universe being equal to 1/H or to a fraction of 1/H appears to be impossible as the consequence of Hubble observations and the Hubble Law, even when the Hubble Law is distorted to conform to this result, and even when the calculation of t is made using the equation of t=-s/v, incorrectly, and a distortion by standard cosmology rules, as described above.

Does this mean we never had a "Big Bang" and all known and observable matter did not really come from the "primeval atom"? Can we point-point to the "accounting error" that created the "Big Bang" and is responsible for the creation of all visible matter 13.7 Billion years ago?

Does this mean we are back to "earth-is-flat" concept as we tend to generalize and force all our unanswered questions into "The Big Bang" theory because there are actually no better answers right now, and yet "The Big Bang" theory looks good, sounds good and has a distinct aura of authority around itself? Not quite, but scientists and researchers like myself are looking at startling new evidence that is pointing in new and different direction.

PART I

In order to observe the density of the mass during the "Big Bang" explosion we must take a look at the time interval from t=0 to tob was assumed to be tob = sob divided by vob = 1/H and calculated incorrectly in my opinion from the observed values of sob and vob for each galaxy that would correspond to the distance interval for each galaxy from s=0 to sob. In fact sob was considered the value at the moment of observation, ignoring the additional time interval from the light bearing the values of sob and vob to travel from the galaxy to the observer. This additional time interval was sob expressed in years (if sob was observed in light years, or the appropriate amounts with other units) for each galaxy.

Thus the time interval from the moment when t=0 and s=0 to the moment the observation was being made, herein labeled tsi, was tsi = tob + sob in years = 1/H + sob in years (or in equivalent units) for each galaxy. Let the subscript on the lower left side designate the particular galaxy with which the quantity is associated, thus ^sob ^vob ^tob ( ^sob divided by ^vob), ^tsi, s for each galaxy labeled a^Ga^sob a^vob a^tob a^tsi a^s and for galaxy labeled b^Gb^sob b^vob b^tob b^tsi b^s.

Since, for all, or nearly all galaxies the observed distances are different galaxies - a^Gb^Gcan be two such galaxies, so that a^sob tdoes not equal b^sob and since a^tsi equals 1/H plus b^sob in years 1/H plus a^sob does not equal 1/H plus b^sob and thus a^tsi does not equal b^tsi so that extrapolating from the moment of observation a^s=0and b^s=0occur at different intervals of the time in the past from the moments of observation and thus do not occur simultaneously.

Consequently, the concept of all the different galaxies being packed together at infinite density at the same instant, and the subsequent "Big Bang", as well as the concept of the age of the Universe being equal to 1/H or to a fraction of 1/H, appear to be impossible as consequences of the Hubble observations, and the Hubble law, even when the Hubble law is distorted to conform to this result which I believe it has been by man, and even when the calculation of t is made using the equation t = s/v (incorrectly, in my view), and a distortion by standard cosmology as described above.

What I am herein describing in effect is the age and the expansion of the Universe based on the Hubble Law that has either been distorted and manipulated to wrongly illustrate the concept of all the different galaxies being packed together at infinite density at the same instant. Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity clearly postulates that space-time measurements are relative to the movement of reference frames whereby in essence there's no simultaneity at a distance anymore, but that they are relative to the measurements of space and time that are not dependent on our subjective experience, but are of objective nature entirely relative to the relations of the velocities of what we measure and what we measure them with. Further, as the invariance of space-time measurements appears only in abstract mathematical formula, even if the Hubble Law has not been distorted to confirm the results which have been calculated incorrectly, the following equation points succinctly to the same exact conclusion about the derivation from the Hubble Law using the equation of t= s/v to calculate t that can also be presented as follows:

Let the observed galaxies be labeled 1^G2^G3^G4^G5^G............. n^Ggoing in order from the more distant to the less distant, and let the observed distance for galaxy 1^Gbe labeled 1^sob, for galaxy 2^G2^sob, for galaxy 3^G3^sob, and so on for galaxy n^Gn^sob, so that 1^sob> 2^sob> 3^sob> 4^sob> n^sob and the corresponding observed velocities labeled in the same way, i.e. 1^vob for galaxy 1^G 2^vob for galaxy 2^G 3^vob for galaxy 3^Gand so on to n^vob for galaxy n^G so that 1^vob> 2^vob> 3^vob> 4^vob> n^vob.

The additional time interval for the light carrying the information on the values of ^sob and ^vob in each case from the galaxy to the observer is ^sob expressed in years (or other equivalent units), since it requires ^sob in years for light to travel ^sob light years. Thus the time elapsed, in each case, from t=0 when s=0 to t= ^tsi, the moment of observation, is ^tsi = ^tob = ^sob (in years or the equivalent).

Let the subscript on the lower left side designate the particular galaxy with which the quantity is associated. Thus ^sob ^vob ^tob (=^sob/ ^vob), ^tsi, s for galaxy ^{a^G}be designated a^sob, a^vob, a^tob, a^tsi , a^s and for galaxy ^{b^G}be designated b^sob, b^vob, b^tob, b^tsi , b^s.

Since for all, or nearly all, galaxies the observed distances are different, galaxies ^{a^G}and ^{b^G}can be two such galaxies, so that a^sob ≠ b^sob and since

a^tsi = 1/H + a^sob in years and

b^tsi = 1/H + b^sob in years

1/H + a^sob ≠ 1/H + b^sob and thus a^tsi ≠ b^tsi

so that extrapolating back from the moment of observation, a^s=0 and b^s=0 at different intervals of time in the past from the moment of observation and thus do not occur simultaneously.

Thus the concept of all the different galaxies being packed together at infinite density at the same instant and the subsequent "Big Bang" as well as the concept of "The Age of the Universe" being equal to 1/H or a fraction thereof appear to be impossible as consequences of the Hubble observations and the Hubble Law, even when the calculation of ti is made using the equation t = s/v (incorrectly in my opinion) and as distorted by standard cosmology, as described above.

PART II and CONCLUSION:

Coming soon..... Part II and Conclusion proving decades long invariance about "The Big Bang" and scientific explanation why current estimations of the actual age of our Universe based on Hubble law have been grossly miscalculated.

Also, "Beyond the M-Theory" - how do we solve the dilemma of Expanding Universe and solve the mystery of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Also coming up Theory of Everything and the dualistic and unpredictable behavior of energy, Higgs Field and relativistic influence of time and its postulated behavior along with missing components in the Standard Model that are dramatically changing current views in contemporary theoretical physics.

2009-12-12T05:46:00.000-08:00

On Rational Empiricism of Culture

German sociologist Karl Mannheim in his Ideologie und Utopie (c.1929) and a social theorist Max Scheler in his Versuche zu einer Soziologie des Wissens (c.1924) have both postulated a view that life is not determined by our consciousness, but that our consciousness is determined by the way we live; and more importantly all our knowledge is a product of culture that is the driving force behind most of our actions.

This means that what is meaningful and significant to someone from Judeo-Christian culture is not meanigful in the same way to someone with Buddhist background, or with Islamic background.

Culture, being the soul of our society is the source of our social consciousness and the manifestation behind our individual personalities. The relationship we have with culture is what unifies us and at the same time what separates us from other cultures. This relationship can be directly traced to technology, how we use technology and how technology helps us cross cultural barriers and eventually break them. It is a dynamic process, albeit very slow and incremental.

In order to understand this role as cultured human beings in the ever evolving technological world we need to look at ourselves individually, and as a society in the context of where we came from and where we are going.

In Pre-Industrial society the main focus was on agriculture and on struggling with survival, with the law of diminishing returns. In the Industrial Society which is where we are at the moment, although slowly transitioning from industrial to post-industrial phase the focus is on energy and on producing goods, as we continuously turn our attention towards better understanding of energy, its behavior and its various forms and converting this experience to our advantage.

The plans for getting away from fossil fuels, for example, the yearning to use fission effectively, and to learn to use other sources of energy that are far more powerful than fossil fuels are the hallmark of The Industrial society. In The Post-Industrial society the focus is not as much on agriculture and on manufacturing goods, but on knowledge, on sharing and obtaining knowledge and on making it freely available to everyone.

We are now beginning to enter this age, albeit very slowly and incrementally as our cultural barriers prevent us from freely sharing and accepting what we know in a way that would benefit everyone. As those barriers are being challenged and we begin to transition to this new Age of Syncretism beyond the Industrial and Post-Industrial era this is the subject of my work.

NEW UNIVERSITY IN VIRTUAL REALITY

2009-10-18T13:08:00.000-07:00

Few hours spend in this interactive theater will be equivalent to having complete "window on the world" experience with access to any subject of one's choice in the world of knowledge in arts and sciences in 3D.

This is the new model for education in 21st Century - Multum In Parvo.

There are no textbooks, and everything is totally and completely interactive.

The American Pavilion will feature all we know about America - its history, arts and sciences and its accomplishments from the very beginning until now in 3D telepresence with tele-immersion. No need for textbooks, or classroom assignments - it will all be run by AI-driven supercomputers that will fully interact with the audience on any subject.

2009-04-18T05:29:00.001-07:00

(Excerpts)

The Big Bang & The Expanding Universe

The Hubble Law, also called the Hubble equation describes the relation of the velocity and the distance from the observer of each of many galaxies observed over a wide range by Edwin Hubble, Vesto Slipher, Milton Humason and their associates and successors, and it is the velocity= H x distances or, if v=velocity and s=distances, namely v=Hs in which H is the Hubble Constant - a constant of proportionality.

For each galaxy, the velocity v is calculated from red shift, spectographic observations and from the Doppler effect. The distances from the observer s was determined from the absolute brightness, from the period called Cepheid variables, the Cepheid variable stars were the key instruments in Edwin Hubble’s 1923 conclusion that M31 (Andromeda) was an external galaxy as opposed to a smaller nebula within the Milky Way, from the apparent brightness measurements, and from the Inverse Square Law relating those measurements to distances.

These limits are approximately equivalent to V=1/H having the dimension of time lying between the limits of 10 x 10⁹years and 20 x 10⁹years and 15 x 10⁹years that are often being used as acceptable value.

Why is this important?

For over a 1,000 years humanity has been stuck on “earth-is-flat” concept until Copernican revolution has changed it, and for nearly 100 years now we have been stuck on Einstein’s quantum mechanics and quantum relativity and both are being seriously questioned although many tenets in Einstein's assertions, as in other theories are still valid and irrefutable.

"Let the observed galaxy be labeled 1^G2^G3^G4^Gn^G etc. going in order from the distant to the less distant, and let the observed distance for the galaxy 1^Gbe labeled 1^sob, for galaxy 2^Glet it be 2^sob and the observed galaxy 3^Gbe labeled 3^sob with n^Grepresenting n^sob so that 1^sob> 2^sob> 3^sob> 4^sob> n^sob and let the corresponding observed velocities be labeled in the same way, e.g. 1^vob for galaxy 1^G, 2^vob for galaxy 2^G, 3^vob for galaxy 3^G, 4^vob for galaxy 4^G, n^vob for galaxy n^G, so that 1^vob>2^vob> 3^vob> 4^vob> continue as n^sob, etc."

Moreover, the complicated physics and stages of the first second after “The Big Bang” along with different theories of inflation, specifically the concept of singularity, and the existence of quantum gravity occuring at the instant of “The Big Bang”, the concept of the microwave radiation background observed today as a relic of radiation from the early universe and widely acknowledged as the evidence of “The Big Bang”’, including all the concepts directly dependent on “The Big Bang” theory such as the age of the universe equal 1/H, or a fraction of 1/H combined with Friedman-Robertson-Walker models whether with standard or distorted version of the Hubble Law together, simply do not and cannot compute.

Let’s digress a little bit, namely if we accept some form of “non-local” deterministic reality whereby we assume that some things travel faster than the speed of light, we will be violating Einstein’s special theory of relativity; and Einstein has created this paradox himself by introducing quantum mechanics and special relativity theories together that contradict one another whereby on the quantum level signals do travel faster than the speed of light, and according to "The Big Bang" theory the Universe is expanding at speeds faster than the speed of light, and whereby special theory of relativity expressly prohibits this. So was Einstein wrong? Not necessarily…. In fact, we are simply trying to get beyond Einstein and the inherent paradox in the special relativity theory and quantum mechanics in search of new rules that govern the behavior of matter and energy, hence the subsequent refutation of the Big Bang theory is not a surprise, or exception, and at some point we may have to let go of it as well…

Part II (Continued 05/08/2009) If the Hubble law were not abandoned, as it has been by assuming that v was a constant, and H a variable, and the original Hubble Law v=Hs were followed, with v a variable and H a constant, then calculating t, the time corresponding to the increase of the distance of 0 to s as calculated from equation t=s/v would require t, not only as t=tob and s=sob but all other values of s, except 0 at s=0, t=s/v = 0/0 an indeterminate number we would not have “The Big Bang Theory”.

The method to present the reciprocal of the constant H of proportionality, i.e. 1/H having the dimension of time as an actual time span, and the hastily arrived at conclusion that the time interval from 0 to tob corresponding to the distance interval from s=0 to s= sob was given by the equation of t= tob =sob divided by vob=1divided by Ho for each galaxy led to the concept that the age of the Universe equal 1/Ho given the absence of gravity, the concept of the “Big Bang Theory” and to the subsequent theories ensuing therefrom.

In actuality, all the observations made by Hubble, Humason and their successors were of the sob’s - the observed distance, and vob’s - the observed distances and velocities of galaxies as they existed in the distant past, and the time interval to the present being in direct proportion to the sob - the observed distance for each galaxy.

Does it mean we are back to "earth-is-flat" concept as we tend to generalize and force all our unanswered questions into "The Big Bang Theory" because there are no better answers, and yet the "Big Bang Theory" looks good, sounds good and has a distinct aura of authority around itself?

Not necessarily..... but scientists and researchers like myself are looking at startling new evidence that is pointing in a different direction. (To be continued - perserverantia omnia vincit... )

NEXT.... Beyond the M-Theory. How do we solve the Expanding Universe, as well as Dark Matter and Dark Energy enigma, as well as Theory of Everything, the dualistic and unpredictable behavior of energy, Higgs Field and relativistic influence of time on its postulated behavior, and the missing components in the Standard Model under these dramatically emerging new views. 10/12/09.

World Center For Arts, Cultures & Technology

2008-12-19T17:08:00.000-08:00

In short time, television and computers will merge completely. When they do, whatever you have in front of you, whether hand-held or on a screen will do the same thing. You will have a world of information anywhere you go.

This process took a long time, namely because we had to figure out whether to turn TV into computer, or computer into TV, the latter being a lot more reasonable and practical, and when that was settled we are now on our way to Internet Provided Television, (ipTV) - a world of hundreds of millions of interactive channels that will mark the end of YouTube’s low-resolution videos replaced by high-definition resolution and broadband-driven interactive media. At that point information will be available everywhere and high-information content will become raison d’etre of all technologies.

Languages and cultures other than English will become the focal point of interest beyond sports, movies, music and online games when we are presented with cultural domains previously untapped by high-end information technology capable of delivering full blown, fully interactive, culturally enticing experiences on any subject from any area, and from any period of time.

At that point we will begin to interact with cultures from around the world without having to fly to Europe, Asia and Africa, and by visiting telepresence centers around the world such as the World Center for Arts, Cultures & Technology and experience high-content education live by having personal contact, and personal experience with anyone from the past and present in high-definition 3D, holographic enviroment that will make us feel like we are physicially there, looking at, speaking with and meeting face-to-face with Shakespeare, Plato, Mozart, Einstein, Newton, Galileo, Archimedes, James Joyce, Mark Twain, Jimi Hendrix, Thomas Jefferson, Aristotle, Bach and so on...

A complete 3D reconstruction of each person in tele-immersion will be presented at each and every pavilion theme according to each civilization, or nationality at various locations in the world by using multi telepresence cameras that take rapid, sequential shots of the same object, continuously performing distance calculations, and projecting them into high-end, computer-simulated environment to replicate real-time images and movement. As a result, visitors and audiences at The World Center for Arts, Cultures & Technology will be able to physically shake hands with Christopher Columbus, Winston Churchil, Copernicus, Goethe or whoever they like depending on whatever they select for their cultural insights from the Center's super-computer database.

From there they will be guided around the world immersed in holographic virtual reality experience, hours later walking away with expert knowledge on many subjects such as history, sociology, science, politics and the arts represented as the ultimate juxtaposition of technology and entertainment related to particular segment of the world, blending the audiences highly subjective, entertaining and educational experiences with any time period they wish to visit.

World Center For Arts, Cultures & Technology - Main Location

Highest level scholarly research and information content will be the predominant criteria for The World Center for Arts, Cultures & Technology juxtaposed with a multitude of representative Web portals around the world that will set the standard for new, knowledge-based Internet.

Located on 1,000 acres of land, this futuristic state-of-the-art, tele-presence center will be the future research headquarters for world-renowned scientists and scholars who will daily contribute to the center's cumulative knowledge by providing specifically-tailored research and high-information, knowledge-drive content in many areas of human endeavor available daily to millions of visitors from around the world.

World Center For Arts, Cultures & Technology - 2nd Location

Substantial resources will be added to the economy by various sponsors and corporations - including governments participating in the research and development of each pavilion representing individual countries e.g. the American Pavilion, the English Pavilion, the German Pavilion, the French Pavilion, the Greek Pavilion, the Italian Pavilion representing their country’s national heritage, and featuring their nation's historical accomplishments presented in the context of history, literature, art, music, linguistics, architecture, applied science, philosophy, law, military history, technology, education, medicine, law, sports, religion, business, trade, politics, customs, traditions, folklore, genetics, neuroscience and cognitive sciences and various fields related to each particular era in history up to date.

Tele-Immersion Theater at World Center for Arts, Cultures & Technology

Admission will be free to millions of visitors to WCACT. Known as the Center it will be entirely a non-profit organization. The Center will have substantial revenues from major corporations and governments participating in and representing cultural diversity, heritage and the domain of their nation in select categories such as technology, the arts, the sciences, history, and education in each tele-immersion Pavilion of their national origin. Corresponding galaxy of websites and portals featuring high-end information content will accompany the work and mission of the Center globally.

Intelligent Design and Smart Decision Processing in Search Engines

2008-12-19T08:02:00.000-08:00

( Note: Intelligent design in this article does not refer to creationism, but simply to smart programing)

Intelligent design and IQ interaction between networks that would be equal to and interact with neuro-linguistic programming of human beings require a new approach to software design and extensive application of mathematical models versus nearly exclusive reliance on heuristics and language-driven algorithms that software designers routinely utilize today.

When one searches for “What is the meaning of Life?” today’s search engines typically respond with: life insurance, or something equivalent to it because they cannot recognize and identify presented information for what it is.

In smart decision processing, the answers to the queries cannot simply be contained in the question as in existing algorithmic formulas today, but utilize complex mathematical modeling genetic algorithms, mathematics on strings and other high-end modelling such as in this smart MCPS (massive computational processing structure) system of decision processing:

Today's search engines come up with answers in the same way that a word processor finds them, as words and as meaningless characters and display them indiscriminately.

None of the current search engines have a database for accurately recognizing and identifying information on the Web, hence when one searches for a jaguar, for example, the search engines cannot distinguish whether it is a cat, a car, or a member of a football team.

Intelligent processing is they key to transition from Information Age to Post-Industrial society based on knowledge wherein lies enormous distiction between knowledge and information, on the free flow of knowledge globally, and on sharing, organizing and distribution of theoretical knowledege vis-a-vis nearly exclusive dependence on behavior that is primarily engaged in and solely focused on utilization and exploitation of energy, dissemination of information and producing goods from raw materials.

2008-12-18T10:42:00.000-08:00

On Rational Empiricism of Culture

German sociologist Karl Mannheim in his Ideologie und Utopie (c.1929) and a social theorist Max Scheler in his Versuche zu einer Soziologie des Wissens (c.1924) have both postulated a view that life is not determined by our consciousness, but rather that our consciousness is determined by the way we live, and more importantly that all our knowledge is a product of culture that is the driving force behind all our knowledge, and behind most of our actions.

This means that what is meaningful and significant for someone from Judeo-Christian culture is not meanigful in the same way to someone with Budhist background, or with Islamic background.

Culture, being the soul of our society is the source of our social consciousness and the manifestation behind our individual personalities. Our relationship with culture is what unifies us and at the same time what separates us from other cultures.

This relationship can be directly traced to technology, how we use technology and how technology helps us cross cultural barriers and eventually break them. It is a dynamic process, albeit very slow and incremental.

In order to understand our role as cultured human beings in the ever evolving technological world we need to look at ourselves individually, and as a society in the context of where we came from and where we are going.

In Pre-Industrial society the main focus was on agriculture and on struggling with survival, with the law of diminishing returns.

In Industrial Society our focus is on energy and on producing goods, on the understanding of energy, its behavior and its various forms and in turning energy to our advantage. Our plans for getting away from fossil fuels, for example, our yearning to use fission effectively, and to learn to use other sources of energy that are far more powerful than fosssil fuels are the focus of Industrial society.

In Post-Industrial society the focus is not as much on agriculture and on manufacturing goods, but on knowledge, on sharing and obtaining knowledge and on making it freely available to everyone.

We are now beginning to enter this age, albeit very slowly and incrementally as our cultural barriers prevent us from freely sharing and accepting what we know in a way that would benefit everyone.

As those barriers are being challenged and we begin to transition to this new Age of Syncretism beyond the Industrial and Post-Industrial era this is the subject of my work.